Home  |  Contribute  |  Site Map
  • Register with the TMJA
  • Update Profile
  • Forgot Password?

  • "Changing The Face of TMJ"  
    Support the TMJA!
    Make a contribution and receive your wristband!



    iGive.com  

  • Contribute
  • Register with the TMJA
  • Join the TMJ Community

  • Follow tmjassociation on Twitter




    TMJ Disorders - Implants

    *   History of TMJ Implants
    *   Types of TMJ Prosthetics
    *   TMJ Implants & Their Manufacturers
    *   TMJ Implant Problems
    *   TMJ Implant Congressional Hearings

    The following is an excerpt from "TMJ Technology Gone Awry", a presentation by Terrie Cowley at the Gorham Intertech Conference on October 23, 1994.

    HISTORY OF TMJ IMPLANTS

    Various materials have been used to replace all or part of the temporomandibular joint. Sometimes, surgeons replace the disc with an interpositional implant (IPI). In other cases, the condyle (the head of the mandible, or lower jaw), fossa (the skull or socket of the jaw joint), or both, are replaced with manufactured prosthetic devices.

    The total number of implant recipients is unknown as a national TMJ implant registry does not exist. It is estimated that between 60,000 and 150,000 Americans have received biomaterial jaw joint parts. Many more have undergone autogenous graft surgery utilizing other parts of the body for reconstruction of the jaw joint. Such parts include rib, cartilage (usually femur or ear), temporalis muscle flap, or fat. Some surgeons use cadaver cartilage.

    Most biomaterials for jaw joint reconstruction were released into the medical market before the 1976 Medical Devices Amendment Act was passed. This Act requires manufacturers to provide evidence that their devices are safe and effective. Because the TMJ implant material was already on the market, no testing was required. They were simply "grandfathered" under the Act or, in other words, were allowed to remain available for surgical use. Manufacturers of new products only had to show that their devices were "substantially equivalent" to something already on the market to circumvent the Act.

    ADDITIONAL RESOURCES: